My thoughts?
So here we have two extremes.
On one end is Robertson, far right; on the other Jackson, far left.
I can't genuinely back either.
If I had to choose between the two? Hmmm...if I had a gun to my head and would have to choose between Jackson and Robertson; I'd probably choose whomever the gun holder supports.
Neither Jackson or Robertson are worth dying over.
Are their differences worth dying over? Yes, perhaps; but it would have to be in a far more serious context.
I wonder who has more money, Robertson or Jackson? I wonder who has labored more for their money?
I first heard about the Phil Robertson drama about a week ago. The conversation went something like this:
Neighbor: "There's some controversy brewing about something Duck Dynasty Phil said."
Me: "What'd he say?
Neighbor: "Something about equating gays with beastiality and terrorists."
Me: "And that's a surprise to people?"
I've never seen a full episode of Duck Dynasty (DD). I saw partial parts of the show some years back while staying at a hotel that carried the A&E network. (We don't carry A&E on our home TV. We pay less than $10 a month and get about 15 channels.) I got a few chuckles at the DD snippets I watched but soon found myself bored with yet another reality show. I'm not a big fan of reality shows. I get enough reality on my own. I wonder how much "real" is in "reality shows?"
This past week I read some articles (including the GQ interview) regarding the recent DD and A&E brouhaha. My initial thoughts were along the lines of:
- Yup. That's what Robertson said. That's his opinion. Who would expect differently?
- A&E is a company and can suspend whomever it deems suspendible.
- Follow the money trail; ultimately showbiz boils down to money.
- I wonder if A&E has a policy regarding the speech of reality actors when those actors are offset?
- On the other hand, if A&E remains silent, that would be like an endorsement of Robertson's statements. Why not just make a response statement and let the chips fall were they may? Meh; the network made a judgement call.
- As far as the black-history statements, Phil plain old showed his ignorance. Sure folks were singing in the fields; including Robertson I reckon. That doesn't negate the voluminous historical accounts of black oppression in our country...nor the origin of some of their songs. I wonder if these folks have seen "12 Years A Slave"? Even though "12 Years..." recounts times before Robertson's days but was also "pre-entitlement and pre-welfare."
- Robertson's black-history statement would be kind of like me saying, "I never saw leaders in The Way abuse their power of trust with women. Those women where happy in The Way Corps." Right (not).
- I wonder if down the road some sort of underbelly regarding the Robertson's will come out? I wonder if one of the Robertsons may be in the gay closet?
I am somewhat surprised that many of my high school friends (whom I've read on FB) have joined ranks with the conservative religious right. Many of those high school friends were sexers, druggies, and rock-and-rollers (SDRs). From what I've read Robertson followed the same pattern. Then again I was a young SDR and shortly thereafter became a young Bible thumper...before my high school friends followed a similar route.
I'm no longer an SDR nor a Bible thumper.
Neither do I believe in karma.
****
(Following is a link to an interesting article that addresses the damnable so-called-what-goes-around-comes-around "Law of Karma": Komments on Karma.)
****